Why I Didn’t Sentence Nnamdi Kanu to Death — Justice Omotosho Tell Nigerians

• According to Justice Omotosho, his decision to avoid the death penalty for Nnamdi Kanu was guided by moral teachings that emphasize mercy.

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has explained why he chose to sentence Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), to life imprisonment rather than the death penalty after his terrorism conviction on Thursday.

According to the judge, the appropriate punishment under the law was the death penalty, but he deliberately opted for leniency based on moral and spiritual principles. He said the teachings of the Holy Book strongly influenced his decision, noting that many countries are moving toward abolishing capital punishment, while religious doctrines emphasize compassion.

Quoting from the book of Matthew, Justice Omotosho said Jesus Christ encouraged His followers to show mercy — a principle he applied in Kanu’s case.

DON’T MISS: BREAKING: Nnamdi Kanu Sentenced to Life Imprisonment

He further ruled that Kanu must be held in a secure facility suitable for his status, stressing that the Kuje Correctional Centre would not serve the intended purpose of the sentence. He ordered that the IPOB leader be placed in protective custody at any safe location within Nigeria.

The court also barred Kanu from accessing electronic devices except under strict supervision by the Office of the National Security Adviser.

In addition, Justice Omotosho ordered the forfeiture of the transmitter used for Kanu’s broadcasts, stating that other linked equipment would also be confiscated if no appeal is filed.