News
JUST IN: Reps Propose Jail Term For Employers Owing Salary
When passed into law, employees can demand payment from their employer by submitting a written claim.
The House of Representatives is proposing a bill to criminalise non-payment or failure to pay salaries by employers of labour and corporate bodies across the country.
According to the bill, VerseNews reports that employers found guilty of failing to pay the salaries of their workers risk three to six months of imprisonment, without the possibility of a fine.
When passed into law, employees can demand payment from their employer by submitting a written claim.
The bill, sponsored by Wale Hammed, a member representing the Agege Federal Constituency, Lagos State, titled, “The Employees Remuneration Protection Bill, 2023, has passed its first reading.
Section 7 (1) of the bill provides that it is unlawful for any employer to “Refuse or neglect to pay the remuneration of his employees, as provided under this Act.”
Section 8 (1) of the bill states that if an employee’s compensation remains unpaid beyond the specified period permitted by this legislation, the employee may submit a written demand to their employer for the payment of their entitlement if they wish to assert their claim.
Therefore, “if an employee fails to remit payment within five business days following service of a demand under Section 9 of this bill, the employee may petition the court for redress by filing a motion on notice.”
Omotosho’s First Jurisdictional Failure — The Court Lacked Authority to Try Kanu
The Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Global Legal Consortium has alleged that the Federal High Court lacked jurisdiction to try Kanu on...
‘No Government Without a Country’: IPOB Rejects Self-Appointed Biafra Government Officers
Mazi Chris Nwaọgụ has reiterated IPOB’s demand for Nnamdi Kanu’s freedom and Biafra’s restoration, while calling for Kanu’s appeal to...
Sokoto Declaration: Emma Powerful Dismantles False Claims, Reaffirms Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Okwu Kanu’s Referendum Position
Kanu’s camp has rejected claims that he did not approve or co-sign the Sokoto Declaration, while stressing that he does...
Kanu’s Unlawful Conviction, the Law That Was Already Dead, and the Shame That Is Waiting for Nigeria’s Judiciary
Christopher Chidera, Esq., has challenged the legal basis of Nnamdi Kanu’s conviction, arguing that the trial court relied on a...
Elochukwu Ohagi Describes Nnamdi Kanu as ‘Anointed Builder’ in Biafran Cenotaph Tribute
Elochukwu Ohagi has described Nnamdi Kanu as an “anointed builder” and “divine instrument” in the struggle for Biafran restoration, highlighting...
Delta Commissioner, Three Others Arrested Over Deputy Director’s Death
Five suspects are now in custody, while police have declared two others wanted as investigations into the ministry official’s death...
Kanu Family Fires Back: ‘No Statutory Transition Means No Valid Sentence’
The Okwu-Kanu Family has called for the immediate hearing of Nnamdi Kanu’s appeal, questioning the written law underpinning his conviction...
IPOB Accuses Nigerian Judiciary of ‘Judicial Banditry’ Over Nnamdi Kanu Conviction
IPOB has accused the Nigerian judiciary of violating constitutional provisions in Nnamdi Kanu’s conviction, questioning the legal basis of the...
IPOB: Nnamdi Kanu Must Be Released Unconditionally, Appeal Must Be Listed — Chris Nwaọgụ
IPOB has renewed its demand for the immediate and unconditional release of Nnamdi Kanu, while calling for his pending appeal...
‘Show Me the Law’ Is Not a Joke — It Is Section 36, Section 122, and the Supreme Court, Spoken from the Dock
Ifedi argues that Kanu’s conviction relied on a repealed terrorism law, raising fundamental constitutional questions about its validity.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login